Is Marriage an Outdated Institution?

According to the latest statistics, the divorce rate is often referred to as 50% of marriages (even by this author in the class) and is actually close to the bottom 40th percentile. (Divorce rate: not as high as you might think, by Dan Hurley, The New York Times, April 19, 2005). But that does not deny the fact that the United States has the highest per capita divorce rate in the world. The fact that so many American marriages end in divorce raises the question of whether marriage is an outdated system. I think the answer depends on your personal variables. Let’s look at the facts first: over 40% of marriages end in divorce. It doesn’t just mean that an intact marriage is happy. The author attended a lecture by a respected psychiatrist, rabbi, and author, suggesting that the other half of an intact marriage was unhappy.

The United States has the highest divorce rate per capita in the world.
The average marriage period in the United States is about 7 to 8 years. Marriage is a system that makes parenting more effective, but marriages involving children often result in divorce rather than marriages without children.
Still, marriage remains a system that many do not exclude or even consider restructuring. Even the question of whether marriage is an outdated system is probably surprising.

A controversial issue in this country today is whether homosexuals should have the right to marry, which again proves their commitment to this social system. Many young people did not dream of not getting married. In fact, many women dream of an imminent marriage from a little girl. This is not just for women. Many men admit that marriage and children are natural conclusions in life.
So what is this author’s argument that the idea of ​​marriage may be out of date? In addition to the statistics above, as the Dalai Lama said,

“The purpose of our lives is to be happy. Because of the depth of our existence, we simply want satisfaction.” I believe. This is becoming more and more true today as more and more people seek happiness. Marriage can be a source of lasting happiness, but for others it is only a temporary feeling of well-being.
The first argument that marriage may be out of date is the divorce rate. Marriage has existed as an institution ever since, according to all found in the author’s study. It was reported that parenting, property payments, and offspring payments were required. In such an era, we needed a society to survive.

More than an association, tribes were needed to survive. As times changed, neighborhoods became tribes and small communities worked together to improve everyone’s lives. However, Western civilization continued to move towards a more individualistic culture. Currently, people are less likely to interact with their neighbors and are much less dependent on them. Indeed, some areas are environmentally constrained and the community is working together to improve the lives of its members. But this is increasingly untrue. For example, how many “kindergartens” were there for children 50 years ago? Visit:-
As this culture becomes more personalized, connections with others become less important to survival. Now we are paying people to do what we have achieved in society. Restaurants and fast food chains, once occasionally delegated to family outings, are the main source of food. There are agencies that deliver or are ready to deliver “ready-made meals.” Cleaning staff, formerly limited to the rich and the enterprise, are used by the middle class. Both parents work with a focus on their careers, personalization paths, and more tedious tasks such as hiring. The point is that partnerships are less needed than they were 60 years ago.
This is the reason for companies that the marriage system may be out of date. But it’s not just about social impact. These changes affect the individuals and individuals that make up the marriage. So what are some of the individual features that can contribute to the obsolete concept of marriage?

The first, as discussed above, is the desire for personalization of married people. People want more and more meaning in their lives beyond starting a family. We are a culture where individuals want to be different. Americans want to stand out. They want to feel like they’ve done something for themselves. As a result, partner support feels inadequate for many. They also want to reach and support their efforts. This alone can contribute to the fight for marriage. Which need comes first? How much do I put my goals in the background to help you reach your goals? When will you be able to pursue happiness?
Another aspect of this is the pursuit of excitement and experience. For some people, experience is more important than possession. Some people enjoy the experience alone. Even those who seek thrills can simply add value to new experiences. These people love to do new things and meet new people. At some point, these characters could have been explorers, adventurers, or other types of risk. However, it seems that it has become more common as a character feature these days. And people with this trait will probably find that their marriage routine is choking.
There are other reasons why marriage can fail in relation to society.

First, we live in a culture that makes marriages romantic, despite the fact that many marriages fail or are unhappy. People are always told that they will find their soulmates, and if this relationship goes wrong, someone who can be “one” will come. In fact, how often can you accurately predict who you are? Most people who get married think they found it. And if that doesn’t work and they remarried, they often believe they found this time. And it’s not limited to those who get married. How many people have involved you romantically, at some point you probably thought you were “alone”? Perhaps this concept, which shows no signs of dying despite evidence of opposition, is, at worst, an illusion, or at best a long shot. In addition to this idea that marriage is idealized, there is a desire to simply have a wedding. First of all, weddings are beautiful. Its splendor, splendor, and beauty make it all magnificent. Everyone should have it. As a result, it doesn’t seem like they have to be together forever. In a recent conversation with a colleague who discussed the marriage, she reported that she wanted to get married. She didn’t necessarily want to marry the boy she wanted to marry, she wanted to marry someone. He said it was a shame to miss her wedding beauty and it. Everyone wants to be Cinderella or Prince Charming overnight. This is not a rare idea. But should it expect them to be together for the rest of their lives? (Two years ago, there was an article in a European country politician advocating a law that a marriage expires seven years later and has the opportunity to be renewed. Of course, she was ridiculed and ridiculed. rice field).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *